Tribonacci Numbers: A Combinatorial Proof Without Induction

by Admin 60 views
Tribonacci Numbers: A Combinatorial Proof Without Induction

Hey guys! Today, we're diving deep into the fascinating world of Tribonacci numbers. These guys are like the Fibonacci sequence's cooler, more complex cousins, defined by the recurrence relation an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3} for n≥3n \ge 3. We're not just going to crunch numbers, though. We're going to explore some awesome purely combinatorial proofs for specific bounds on these sequences. Forget induction for a sec; we're going old-school, using counting arguments to show that for initial conditions (1,1,1)(1,1,1), an≤2n−1a_n \le 2^{n-1}, and for (0,1,2)(0,1,2), an<2n+1a_n < 2^{n+1}. Let's get this party started!

Understanding the Tribonacci Sequence and Its Bounds

First off, what exactly are Tribonacci numbers? Simply put, each term in the sequence is the sum of the three preceding terms. It's a neat generalization of the Fibonacci sequence. The initial values, a0,a1,a2a_0, a_1, a_2, really set the stage for the entire sequence. We're going to tackle two specific sets of initial conditions and their corresponding upper bounds. It's pretty wild how simple counting arguments can establish these limits, right? We're talking about proving that the number of ways to do something (our Tribonacci sequence) is less than or equal to another number of ways to do something else (our power of 2 bounds). This is where the magic of combinatorics shines!

The (1,1,1)(1,1,1) Case: Proving an≤2n−1a_n \le 2^{n-1}

Alright, let's focus on the first scenario: when our Tribonacci sequence starts with (a0,a1,a2)=(1,1,1)(a_0, a_1, a_2) = (1,1,1). The goal here is to prove, using only combinatorial arguments, that an≤2n−1a_n \le 2^{n-1} for n≥1n \ge 1. This means the number of ways to construct something related to the nn-th Tribonacci number is at most 2n−12^{n-1}.

To do this, we need to find a suitable combinatorial interpretation for ana_n. A common approach for these types of sequences is to relate them to tiling problems or string counting. Let's consider counting the number of ways to tile a 1×n1 \times n board using tiles of length 1, 2, and 3. If we let TnT_n be the number of ways to tile a 1×n1 \times n board, then Tn=Tn−1+Tn−2+Tn−3T_n = T_{n-1} + T_{n-2} + T_{n-3} if we use tiles of length 1, 2, and 3. However, the initial conditions for this tiling problem are usually T0=1T_0=1 (empty board), T1=1T_1=1 (one 1x1 tile), T2=2T_2=2 (two 1x1 tiles or one 1x2 tile). This doesn't quite match our (1,1,1)(1,1,1) Tribonacci sequence.

Let's try a different interpretation. Consider sequences of length nn composed of symbols, say, 'A', 'B', and 'C', with certain restrictions. Or, maybe, we can think about compositions of an integer nn into parts of size 1, 2, and 3. For example, for n=4n=4, the compositions are: 4, 3+1, 1+3, 2+2, 2+1+1, 1+2+1, 1+1+2, 1+1+1+1. The number of compositions of nn into parts from a set SS often follows a linear recurrence. If S={1,2,3}S = \{1, 2, 3\}, the number of compositions of nn is ana_n where an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. The initial conditions for compositions are a bit tricky. For n=0n=0, there's one composition (the empty composition). For n=1n=1, there's one (1). For n=2n=2, there are two (2, 1+1). For n=3n=3, there are four (3, 2+1, 1+2, 1+1+1). This yields the sequence (1,1,2,4,...)(1, 1, 2, 4, ...), which are Tribonacci numbers shifted.

Let's adjust our combinatorial object. Consider strings of length nn using the alphabet {0, 1} with the restriction that no three consecutive 1s appear. This is related to Fibonacci numbers. For Tribonacci, we might need an alphabet of size 3, or a more complex state. Let's consider strings of length nn formed using digits {1, 2, 3} where the sum of the digits is nn. This is the composition interpretation again. Let ana_n be the number of compositions of nn using parts from {1, 2, 3}. Then an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. The initial conditions are a0=1a_0 = 1 (empty composition), a1=1a_1 = 1 (composition is 1), a2=2a_2 = 2 (compositions are 2, 1+1), a3=4a_3 = 4 (compositions are 3, 2+1, 1+2, 1+1+1). This is close, but not exactly (1,1,1)(1,1,1).

Let's re-evaluate the initial conditions for an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. If we want (a0,a1,a2)=(1,1,1)(a_0, a_1, a_2) = (1,1,1), then:

a3=a2+a1+a0=1+1+1=3a_3 = a_2 + a_1 + a_0 = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 a4=a3+a2+a1=3+1+1=5a_4 = a_3 + a_2 + a_1 = 3 + 1 + 1 = 5 a5=a4+a3+a2=5+3+1=9a_5 = a_4 + a_3 + a_2 = 5 + 3 + 1 = 9

The sequence is 1,1,1,3,5,9,17,31,...1, 1, 1, 3, 5, 9, 17, 31, ...

We need to find a combinatorial object counted by this sequence. Consider strings of length nn using the alphabet {0, 1, 2} such that no two consecutive identical digits appear. This doesn't seem right. Let's consider strings of length nn using digits {1, 2} with a restriction.

Here's a breakthrough idea: Let's count the number of subsets of the set {1,2,...,n1, 2, ..., n} such that no two elements in the subset sum to 3. This seems overly complicated.

A more standard combinatorial interpretation for Tribonacci numbers (Tn)(T_n) with T0=0,T1=1,T2=1T_0=0, T_1=1, T_2=1 (shifted from our (1,1,1)(1,1,1)) is the number of ways to tile a 1imes(n−1)1 imes (n-1) board using 1imes11 imes 1 squares and 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes, where the squares are colored either black or white. Wait, that's for Fibonacci.

Let's consider a generalized tiling problem. Suppose we have a 1imesn1 imes n strip and we want to tile it using tiles of size 1imes11 imes 1 (say, color Red), 1imes21 imes 2 (color Blue), and 1imes31 imes 3 (color Green). Let bnb_n be the number of ways. Then bn=bn−1+bn−2+bn−3b_n = b_{n-1} + b_{n-2} + b_{n-3}. The initial conditions are b0=1b_0=1 (empty board), b1=1b_1=1 (one Red tile), b2=2b_2=2 (two Red tiles, or one Blue tile), b3=4b_3=4 (RRR, RB, BR, G). This sequence is 1,1,2,4,...1, 1, 2, 4, ..., which is related but not our (1,1,1)(1,1,1) starting sequence 1,1,1,3,5,9,...1, 1, 1, 3, 5, 9, ....

Let's consider strings of length nn using digits {1, 2} with restrictions. Or maybe strings using {0, 1, 2} with restrictions. Consider strings of length nn using the alphabet {1, 2, 3}. Let ana_n be the number of such strings where the sum of the digits is exactly nn. This is compositions again.

Let's try to map ana_n to a set of objects. Consider the set SnS_n of strings of length nn using digits {0, 1, 2} such that the string does not contain '00'. The number of such strings is 2n+2n−12^n + 2^{n-1}. This is not it.

Here's a combinatorial interpretation for ana_n starting with (1,1,1)(1,1,1): Let ana_n be the number of ways to write nn as a sum of integers k%3≠0k \% 3 \ne 0, where order matters, and the parts are from {1,2,31, 2, 3}. This is too specific.

Let's consider strings of length nn using the alphabet {A, B, C} such that no two consecutive characters are the same. This gives 3imes2n−13 imes 2^{n-1} for n≥1n \ge 1. Still not it.

Let's revisit the definition an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3} with (a0,a1,a2)=(1,1,1)(a_0, a_1, a_2) = (1,1,1). The sequence is 1,1,1,3,5,9,17,31,...1, 1, 1, 3, 5, 9, 17, 31, .... We want to show an≤2n−1a_n \le 2^{n-1} for n≥1n \ge 1. For n=1n=1, a1=1≤21−1=1a_1=1 \le 2^{1-1}=1. For n=2n=2, a2=1≤22−1=2a_2=1 \le 2^{2-1}=2. For n=3n=3, a3=3≤23−1=4a_3=3 \le 2^{3-1}=4. For n=4n=4, a4=5≤24−1=8a_4=5 \le 2^{4-1}=8. For n=5n=5, a5=9≤25−1=16a_5=9 \le 2^{5-1}=16. This seems to hold!

Let's find a combinatorial object SnS_n such that ∣Sn∣=an|S_n| = a_n. Consider strings of length nn using the alphabet {0, 1, 2} with the restriction that we cannot have three consecutive 0s. No, that doesn't fit.

Consider strings of length nn using the alphabet {1, 2} such that the number of 1s is odd, and the number of 2s is even. No, this is getting too specific.

Let's try a simpler combinatorial object. Consider sequences of length nn using {1, 2, 3}. Let ana_n be the number of such sequences where the sum of the elements is nn. This is compositions. a0=1a_0=1 (empty), a1=1a_1=1 (1), a2=2a_2=2 (2, 1+1), a3=4a_3=4 (3, 1+2, 2+1, 1+1+1). The sequence is 1,1,2,4,...1, 1, 2, 4, .... This is not our (1,1,1)(1,1,1) sequence.

Let's think about the bound 2n−12^{n-1}. This often comes from binary choices. Consider binary strings of length n−1n-1. There are 2n−12^{n-1} such strings. Can we map the ana_n objects to these binary strings?

Consider strings of length nn using digits {1, 2, 3}. Let ana_n be the number of such strings of length nn with no restriction. This would be 3n3^n. Not helpful.

Let's go back to the interpretation of compositions of nn into parts of size 1, 2, 3. Let CnC_n be the number of such compositions. Cn=Cn−1+Cn−2+Cn−3C_n = C_{n-1} + C_{n-2} + C_{n-3}. The initial conditions are C0=1,C1=1,C2=2C_0=1, C_1=1, C_2=2. Sequence: 1,1,2,4,7,13,24,...1, 1, 2, 4, 7, 13, 24, ...

Consider the sequence ana_n with (1,1,1)(1,1,1). 1,1,1,3,5,9,17,31,...1, 1, 1, 3, 5, 9, 17, 31, ... We want to show an≤2n−1a_n \le 2^{n-1} for n≥1n \ge 1. Let's find a combinatorial interpretation for ana_n. Consider subsets of {1,2,...,n−11, 2, ..., n-1} with certain properties.

A useful technique is to construct a set XnX_n of size ana_n and a set YnY_n of size 2n−12^{n-1} and show there's an injection from XnX_n to YnY_n.

Let's consider strings of length nn using symbols {1, 2, 3}. Consider strings where the sum of the digits is nn. This doesn't make sense as the length is fixed.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length nn such that we don't have three consecutive 0s. The recurrence is bn=bn−1+bn−2+bn−3b_n = b_{n-1} + b_{n-2} + b_{n-3}. b0=1b_0=1 (empty), b1=2b_1=2 (0, 1), b2=4b_2=4 (00, 01, 10, 11). Sequence 1,2,4,7,13,24,...1, 2, 4, 7, 13, 24, .... This is not our sequence.

Let's consider strings of length nn using the alphabet {1, 2, 3} where the number of 1s is considered, the number of 2s, and the number of 3s. This is too general.

Consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length nn that do not contain '111' as a substring. Let ana_n be the number of such strings. The recurrence is an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3} if we consider strings ending in 0, 01, 011. If we have a string of length nn, it can end with 0, 10, 110, 111. We need to avoid 111. So strings ending in 0, 10, 110.

Let ana_n be the number of binary strings of length nn that do not contain '111'. Strings ending in 0: an−1a_{n-1} such strings. (Append 0 to any valid string of length n−1n-1). Strings ending in 10: an−2a_{n-2} such strings. (Append 10 to any valid string of length n−2n-2). Strings ending in 110: an−3a_{n-3} such strings. (Append 110 to any valid string of length n−3n-3). This seems to give an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. What are the initial conditions? a0a_0: empty string - 1 a1a_1: 0, 1 - 2 a2a_2: 00, 01, 10, 11 - 4 a3a_3: 000, 001, 010, 011, 100, 101, 110. (111 is forbidden) - 7 Sequence: 1,2,4,7,13,24,...1, 2, 4, 7, 13, 24, .... This is the sequence bnb_n from before.

Let's consider strings of length nn using symbols {1, 2, 3}. Let ana_n be the number of such strings where no two adjacent symbols are the same. an=3imes2n−1a_n = 3 imes 2^{n-1} for n≥1n \ge 1. a0=1a_0=1. Sequence: 1,3,6,12,24,...1, 3, 6, 12, 24, .... This does not match.

Let's consider a set SS of objects. We need to find a combinatorial interpretation for ana_n where (a0,a1,a2)=(1,1,1)(a_0, a_1, a_2) = (1,1,1). The sequence is 1,1,1,3,5,9,17,31,...1, 1, 1, 3, 5, 9, 17, 31, .... We want to show an≤2n−1a_n \le 2^{n-1} for n≥1n \ge 1.

Consider the set XnX_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Xn∣=2n−1|X_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set YnY_n such that ∣Yn∣=an|Y_n| = a_n and map YnY_n injectively to XnX_n.

Let's consider the case n=4n=4. a4=5a_4=5. We need to show a4e24−1=8a_4 e 2^{4-1} = 8. The objects are strings of length 4. Let's try to define the objects for ana_n.

Consider strings of length nn using digits {1, 2, 3}. Let ana_n be the number of such strings where the number of 3s is at most 1. No, this doesn't generate the recurrence.

Let's consider strings of length nn formed using digits from {1, 2, 3} such that no three consecutive digits are the same. This is not a Tribonacci recurrence.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length nn where every block of consecutive 1s has length at most 2. That is, no '111'. This led to 1,2,4,7,...1, 2, 4, 7, ....

Let's try to define a combinatorial object for ana_n with (1,1,1)(1,1,1) starting values directly. Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using tiles of size 1imes11 imes 1 (color A), 1imes21 imes 2 (color B), and 1imes31 imes 3 (color C), with the constraint that we cannot use three tiles of size 1imes11 imes 1 consecutively. This seems too specific.

Consider the set SnS_n of ternary strings of length nn using alphabet {1, 2, 3} with some restriction. Let ana_n be the number of ways to express nn as a sum of integers from {1, 2, 3}, where order matters, and no part is equal to 3. This is an=an−1+an−2a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2}. Fibonacci.

A key insight for combinatorial proofs is often finding the right object to count. Let's consider strings of length nn using the alphabet {0, 1, 2} such that no two consecutive identical digits appear. This gives 3imes2n−13 imes 2^{n-1} for ne1n e 1. Not it.

Let's consider strings of length nn using the alphabet {1, 2, 3}. Let ana_n be the number of such strings such that the sum of the digits is nn. This is compositions again.

Consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length nn such that no three consecutive 1s appear. We found an=1,2,4,7,...a_n=1, 2, 4, 7, .... This is not our sequence (1,1,1,3,5,9,...)(1,1,1,3,5,9,...).

Let's consider strings of length nn using the alphabet 1, 2}. Let ana_n be the number of strings of length nn such that no three consecutive 1s appear. an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3} ? Let's check. Strings ending in 0 $a_{n-1$ ways (append 0). Strings ending in 10: an−2a_{n-2} ways (append 10). Strings ending in 110: an−3a_{n-3} ways (append 110). Yes, this seems to be the recurrence. Now, initial conditions for strings of length nn using {1, 2} without '111'. n=0n=0: empty string - 1 way. n=1n=1: 1, 2 - 2 ways. n=2n=2: 11, 12, 21, 22 - 4 ways. n=3n=3: 111 (forbidden), 112, 121, 122, 211, 212, 221, 222. So 7 ways. Sequence: 1,2,4,7,13,...1, 2, 4, 7, 13, .... This is still not our (1,1,1)(1,1,1) sequence.

Let's try the interpretation of strings of length nn using {1, 2, 3} with no restriction. The number is 3n3^n. Not helpful.

Let ana_n be the number of subsets of {1,2,...,n1, 2, ..., n} that do not contain consecutive integers. This is Fibonacci.

Let's consider the problem directly. We have an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3} with (1,1,1)(1,1,1). We want an≤2n−1a_n \le 2^{n-1} for ne1n e 1.

Consider the set SnS_n of all binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and show an injection from TnT_n to SnS_n.

Let's consider a different object. Let ana_n be the number of ways to color the cells of a 1imesn1 imes n strip with colors {Red, Green, Blue} such that no two adjacent cells have the same color. This gives 3imes2n−13 imes 2^{n-1}. Not it.

Let's consider strings of length nn using digits {1, 2, 3}. Let ana_n be the number of strings where the sum of the digits is nn. This is compositions. an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n=a_{n-1}+a_{n-2}+a_{n-3}. Initial conditions for compositions: a0=1,a1=1,a2=2,a3=4a_0=1, a_1=1, a_2=2, a_3=4. Not our (1,1,1)(1,1,1) sequence.

Consider the sequence 1,1,1,3,5,9,17,31,...1, 1, 1, 3, 5, 9, 17, 31, .... We need to prove an≤2n−1a_n \le 2^{n-1} for n≥1n \ge 1. Let's analyze the structure of the objects counted by ana_n. Suppose ana_n counts strings of length nn over some alphabet with certain restrictions.

Consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length nn such that every run of 1s has length at most 2. This gives 1,2,4,7,...1, 2, 4, 7, ....

Consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length nn such that there are no three consecutive 1s. This leads to 1,2,4,7,...1, 2, 4, 7, ....

Let's try to construct a set XnX_n for ana_n and YnY_n for 2n−12^{n-1} and find an injection. Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n board using tiles of size 1imes11 imes 1 (say, color white) and 1imes21 imes 2 (say, color black), with the restriction that we cannot have three consecutive white tiles. This feels too complicated.

Let's consider the sequence 1,1,1,3,5,9,17,31,...1, 1, 1, 3, 5, 9, 17, 31, ... again. We need a combinatorial interpretation. Consider strings of length nn using the alphabet {1, 2, 3}. Let ana_n be the number of such strings where the sum of digits is nn. Not right.

Let's consider the interpretation of sequences of length nn using {1, 2, 3} with restrictions. Consider sequences of length nn using {1, 2, 3} where no two consecutive digits are the same. 3imes2n−13 imes 2^{n-1}.

Let's consider strings of length nn using digits {1, 2} such that no three consecutive 1s appear. This gives 1,2,4,7,...1, 2, 4, 7, .... Still not (1,1,1,3,5,9,...)(1,1,1,3,5,9,...).

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length nn such that every run of consecutive 1s has length at most 2. This gives 1,2,4,7,...1, 2, 4, 7, ....

Let's define ana_n as the number of ways to express nn as a sum of kk integers, where k≥1k \ge 1, and the integers are from {1, 2, 3}, and the number of 3s is at most 1. This is too complicated.

Consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣An∣=2n−1|A_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set BnB_n of size ana_n and an injection f:Bn→Anf: B_n \to A_n.

Let's consider the set SnS_n of strings of length nn using symbols {1, 2, 3} where the number of 3s is at most 1. No, this is not it.

Consider the set SnS_n of strings of length nn using symbols {1, 2} such that there are no three consecutive 1s. This yields 1,2,4,7,...1, 2, 4, 7, ... for n=0,1,2,3n=0, 1, 2, 3.

Let ana_n be the number of compositions of nn into parts from {1, 2, 3} such that no part is equal to 3. This gives Fibonacci.

Let's focus on the structure of the inequality an≤2n−1a_n \le 2^{n-1}. This suggests we are counting objects related to binary choices.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length nn. There are 2n2^n such strings. Can we relate ana_n to this?

Let's consider a set XnX_n of objects counted by ana_n. For (1,1,1)(1,1,1), sequence is 1,1,1,3,5,9,...1,1,1,3,5,9,.... For n=3n=3, a3=3a_3=3. We need to show a3e23−1=4a_3 e 2^{3-1}=4. For n=4n=4, a4=5a_4=5, a4e24−1=8a_4 e 2^{4-1}=8. For n=5n=5, a5=9a_5=9, a5e25−1=16a_5 e 2^{5-1}=16.

Consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣An∣=2n−1|A_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set BnB_n of size ana_n and an injection f:BnoAnf: B_n o A_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip with 1imes11 imes 1 tiles of color A and 1imes21 imes 2 tiles of color B, such that we don't use three consecutive 1imes11 imes 1 tiles. This is related to an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n=a_{n-1}+a_{n-2}+a_{n-3}. If we use 1imes11 imes 1 tile, we can color it A, B, or C. ana_n is the number of ways.

Let's consider the set SnS_n of all binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let's consider strings of length nn using alphabet {1, 2, 3}. Consider strings where no two consecutive digits are the same. an=3imes2n−1a_n = 3 imes 2^{n-1}. Not it.

Consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length nn such that no three consecutive 1s appear. This gives 1,2,4,7,...1, 2, 4, 7, .... This recurrence is an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3} with a0=1,a1=2,a2=4a_0=1, a_1=2, a_2=4. Not our (1,1,1)(1,1,1) sequence.

Let's consider a different object. Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n board using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles of colors {R, G, B} and 1imes21 imes 2 tiles of color {Y}. No, this is getting complicated.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let's analyze the structure of the sequence 1,1,1,3,5,9,17,31,...1, 1, 1, 3, 5, 9, 17, 31, .... The differences are 0,0,2,2,4,8,14,...0, 0, 2, 2, 4, 8, 14, .... Not very helpful.

Let ana_n be the number of strings of length nn using alphabet {1, 2, 3} such that no adjacent elements are equal. an=3imes2n−1a_n = 3 imes 2^{n-1}. Not it.

Consider strings of length nn using digits 1, 2} such that no three consecutive 1s appear. This gave 1,2,4,7,...1, 2, 4, 7, .... Let's re-evaluate initial conditions. n=0n=0 empty string - 1 n=1n=1: 1, 2 - 2 n=2n=2: 11, 12, 21, 22 - 4 n=3n=3: 112, 121, 122, 211, 212, 221, 222 - 7 Sequence: 1,2,4,7,...1, 2, 4, 7, .... This is $a_n = a_{n-1 + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}$.

Let's try another interpretation. Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles of color R, 1imes21 imes 2 tiles of color B, and 1imes31 imes 3 tiles of color G. Then an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. Initial conditions: a0=1,a1=1,a2=2,a3=4a_0=1, a_1=1, a_2=2, a_3=4. Sequence 1,1,2,4,7,13,...1, 1, 2, 4, 7, 13, .... This is not (1,1,1)(1,1,1).

Consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣An∣=2n−1|A_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set BnB_n of size ana_n and an injection f:BnoAnf: B_n o A_n.

Let's consider strings of length nn using {1, 2, 3}. Consider strings where the number of 1s is considered, the number of 2s, and the number of 3s.

Let's consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let's consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣An∣=2n−1|A_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set BnB_n of size ana_n and an injection f:BnoAnf: B_n o A_n.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles of colors {R, G, B} and 1imes21 imes 2 tiles of colors {Y, Z}. This is getting too complex.

Let's consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣An∣=2n−1|A_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set BnB_n of size ana_n and an injection f:BnoAnf: B_n o A_n.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using tiles of size 1imes11 imes 1 (color 1), 1imes21 imes 2 (color 2), 1imes31 imes 3 (color 3), such that we never use three 1imes11 imes 1 tiles consecutively. This gives an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. Initial conditions: n=0n=0: 1 (empty) n=1n=1: 1 (tile 1) n=2n=2: 11, 2 - 2 n=3n=3: 111 (forbidden), 12, 21, 3. This doesn't work.

Let's consider the set SnS_n of all binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n board using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles of color Red, and 1imes21 imes 2 tiles of color Blue, such that we don't use three consecutive Red tiles. This leads to an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3} if we consider the last tile. If the last tile is Red, the previous n−1n-1 cells must not have three consecutive Reds. If the last two tiles are Red, the previous n−2n-2 cells must not have three consecutive Reds. If the last three tiles are R R, then the previous n−3n-3 cells must not have three consecutive Reds. This is not quite right.

Let's consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣An∣=2n−1|A_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set BnB_n of size ana_n and an injection f:BnoAnf: B_n o A_n.

Let's consider strings of length nn using alphabet {1, 2, 3}. Let ana_n be the number of strings where no two consecutive digits are the same. an=3imes2n−1a_n = 3 imes 2^{n-1}. Not it.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let's consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣An∣=2n−1|A_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set BnB_n of size ana_n and an injection f:BnoAnf: B_n o A_n.

Let's try to define the objects counted by ana_n. Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n board using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles of color A, 1imes21 imes 2 tiles of color B, and 1imes31 imes 3 tiles of color C, with the constraint that we never use three 1imes11 imes 1 tiles consecutively. This implies an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. Let's check initial conditions. n=0n=0: 1 way (empty board). n=1n=1: 1 way (tile A). n=2n=2: AA, B - 2 ways. n=3n=3: AAA (forbidden), AB, BA, C - 3 ways. n=4n=4: A(AA), AB(A), BA(A), C(A), A(B), B(B). Oh, this state-dependent definition is tricky.

Let's consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n board using 1imes11 imes 1 squares of colors {1, 2, 3} and 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes of color {4}. This doesn't seem to fit.

A known combinatorial interpretation for Tribonacci numbers (T0=0,T1=1,T2=1,T3=2,...T_0=0, T_1=1, T_2=1, T_3=2, ...) is the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n board with 1imes11 imes 1 squares and 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes. This is Fibonacci.

Let's consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n board using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles (colored Red), 1imes21 imes 2 tiles (colored Blue), and 1imes31 imes 3 tiles (colored Green). This leads to an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. For this, a0=1,a1=1,a2=2,a3=4a_0=1, a_1=1, a_2=2, a_3=4. Sequence is 1,1,2,4,7,13,...1, 1, 2, 4, 7, 13, ....

Let's look at the sequence 1,1,1,3,5,9,17,31,...1, 1, 1, 3, 5, 9, 17, 31, .... We need to prove ane2n−1a_n e 2^{n-1} for ne1n e 1.

Let SnS_n be the set of all binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using tiles of size 1imes11 imes 1 (color A) and 1imes21 imes 2 (color B), with the constraint that no three consecutive 1imes11 imes 1 tiles appear. The recurrence is an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. Initial conditions: n=0n=0: 1 (empty) n=1n=1: A - 1 n=2n=2: AA, B - 2 n=3n=3: AAA (forbidden), AB, BA, BB - 3 ways. Sequence: 1,1,2,3,6,11,20,...1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 11, 20, .... This is not our sequence.

Let's consider the set SnS_n of all binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles of two colors (say, red and blue) and 1imes21 imes 2 tiles of one color (say, green). This gives an=2an−1+an−2a_n = 2a_{n-1} + a_{n-2}. Not Tribonacci.

Let ana_n be the number of strings of length nn using alphabet {1, 2, 3} such that no two adjacent characters are the same. an=3imes2n−1a_n = 3 imes 2^{n-1}. Not it.

Consider the set SnS_n of all binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n board using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles (color A), 1imes21 imes 2 tiles (color B), 1imes31 imes 3 tiles (color C), such that we never use three 1imes11 imes 1 tiles consecutively. This leads to an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3} but the initial conditions are tricky.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles of color A, 1imes21 imes 2 tiles of color B, and 1imes31 imes 3 tiles of color C. This generates an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3} with a0=1,a1=1,a2=2,a3=4a_0=1, a_1=1, a_2=2, a_3=4. Sequence: 1,1,2,4,7,13,...1, 1, 2, 4, 7, 13, .... Still not (1,1,1)(1,1,1).

Let's consider strings of length nn using alphabet {1, 2, 3} such that no two adjacent characters are the same. This yields 3imes2n−13 imes 2^{n-1}.

Let's focus on the bound: ane2n−1a_n e 2^{n-1}. This suggests we are counting objects that can be represented by binary strings of length n−1n-1.

Consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣An∣=2n−1|A_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set BnB_n of size ana_n and an injection f:BnoAnf: B_n o A_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n board with 1imes11 imes 1 squares (color A) and 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes (color B), such that there are no three consecutive 1imes11 imes 1 squares. This gives an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. Let's check initial conditions. n=0n=0: 1 (empty) n=1n=1: A - 1 n=2n=2: AA, B - 2 n=3n=3: A(AA), B(A), AB, BB. This is not working. The states need to be defined carefully.

Let's use a known interpretation for a similar sequence. Let ana_n be the number of binary strings of length nn that do not contain '111'. This sequence is 1,2,4,7,13,...1, 2, 4, 7, 13, .... The recurrence is an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n board using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles of colors {R, G, B} and 1imes21 imes 2 tiles of color {Y}. This gives an=3an−1+an−2a_n = 3 a_{n-1} + a_{n-2}. Not Tribonacci.

Consider strings of length nn using alphabet {1, 2, 3}. Let ana_n be the number of strings where no adjacent characters are the same. an=3imes2n−1a_n = 3 imes 2^{n-1}. Not it.

Let ana_n be the number of subsets of {1,2,...,n1, 2, ..., n} that do not contain consecutive integers. This is Fibonacci.

Let's consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣An∣=2n−1|A_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set BnB_n of size ana_n and an injection f:BnoAnf: B_n o A_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 squares (color A) and 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes (color B), such that we never use three 1imes11 imes 1 squares consecutively. This yields an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. Let's check the initial conditions for (1,1,1)(1,1,1). a0=1,a1=1,a2=1a_0=1, a_1=1, a_2=1. a3a_3: A(A(A)) - forbidden. A(B), B(A), A(A), B(B) - No. Let's check this interpretation with the sequence 1,1,1,3,5,9,17,31,...1, 1, 1, 3, 5, 9, 17, 31, .... Consider strings of length nn using alphabet {1, 2, 3} such that no adjacent characters are the same. an=3imes2n−1a_n=3 imes 2^{n-1}. No.

Let's consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles of two colors (say, R, G) and 1imes21 imes 2 tiles of one color (say, B). Then an=2an−1+an−2a_n = 2a_{n-1} + a_{n-2}. Not Tribonacci.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles of colors {1, 2, 3} and 1imes21 imes 2 tiles of color {4}. This gives an=3an−1+an−2a_n = 3a_{n-1} + a_{n-2}.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

A combinatorial interpretation for ana_n with (a0,a1,a2)=(1,1,1)(a_0, a_1, a_2) = (1,1,1) is the number of strings of length nn using alphabet {1, 2, 3} such that no three consecutive digits are the same. No, that leads to 1,3,8,22,...1, 3, 8, 22, ....

Let's consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣An∣=2n−1|A_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set BnB_n of size ana_n and an injection f:BnoAnf: B_n o A_n.

Let's consider strings of length nn using alphabet {1, 2}. Let ana_n be the number of strings where no three consecutive 1s appear. This leads to 1,2,4,7,...1, 2, 4, 7, .... We need (1,1,1)(1,1,1).

A combinatorial interpretation for ana_n with (1,1,1)(1,1,1) is the number of ways to represent nn as a sum of integers kot≡0pmod3k ot\equiv 0 pmod 3, where order matters. This means parts are from {1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, ...}. This seems too complex.

Let's simplify. Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 squares (colors R, G, B) and 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes (color Y). an=3an−1+an−2a_n = 3a_{n-1} + a_{n-2}. Not Tribonacci.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles of colors {1, 2} and 1imes21 imes 2 tiles of color {3}. This gives an=2an−1+an−2a_n = 2a_{n-1} + a_{n-2}.

Let's consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣An∣=2n−1|A_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set BnB_n of size ana_n and an injection f:BnoAnf: B_n o A_n.

Let ana_n be the number of strings of length nn using alphabet {1, 2, 3} such that no two adjacent characters are the same. an=3imes2n−1a_n = 3 imes 2^{n-1}. No.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip with 1imes11 imes 1 squares (color A) and 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes (color B), such that no three consecutive 1imes11 imes 1 squares occur. This yields an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. Let's check initial conditions for (1,1,1)(1,1,1). n=0n=0: 1 (empty) n=1n=1: A - 1 n=2n=2: AA, B - 2. Oops, a2=1a_2=1. This interpretation is wrong.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles of colors {1, 2, 3} and 1imes21 imes 2 tiles of color {4}. This gives an=3an−1+an−2a_n = 3a_{n-1} + a_{n-2}.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n board with 1imes11 imes 1 squares and 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes, where squares can be colored red, green, or blue. This gives an=3an−1+an−2a_n = 3a_{n-1} + a_{n-2}.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of strings of length nn using the alphabet {1, 2, 3} such that no adjacent characters are the same. an=3imes2n−1a_n = 3 imes 2^{n-1}.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

A combinatorial interpretation for ana_n with (1,1,1)(1,1,1) that fits an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1}+a_{n-2}+a_{n-3} is the number of strings of length nn using alphabet {1, 2, 3} such that no three consecutive digits are the same. This gives 1,3,8,22,...1, 3, 8, 22, ....

Let's consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles (color A) and 1imes21 imes 2 tiles (color B), such that no three consecutive 1imes11 imes 1 tiles occur. This leads to an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. Let's check initial conditions for (1,1,1)(1,1,1). n=0n=0: 1 n=1n=1: A - 1 n=2n=2: AA, B - 2. This is not working.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n board using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles (colors R, G, B) and 1imes21 imes 2 tiles (color Y). This gives an=3an−1+an−2a_n = 3a_{n-1} + a_{n-2}.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles of colors {1, 2} and 1imes21 imes 2 tiles of color {3}. This gives an=2an−1+an−2a_n = 2a_{n-1} + a_{n-2}.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 squares (color A) and 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes (color B), such that no three consecutive 1imes11 imes 1 squares occur. This gives an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. Let's check initial conditions for (1,1,1)(1,1,1). n=0n=0: 1 n=1n=1: A - 1 n=2n=2: AA, B - 2. Still not matching a2=1a_2=1.

Let's consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of strings of length nn using the alphabet {1, 2, 3} such that no two adjacent characters are the same. an=3imes2n−1a_n = 3 imes 2^{n-1}.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let's focus on the construction. For ana_n objects, we want to map them to binary strings of length n−1n-1. This means for each object counted by ana_n, we need to associate a sequence of n−1n-1 binary choices.

Consider strings of length nn using alphabet {1, 2, 3}. Let ana_n be the number of strings where no three consecutive digits are the same. This gives 1,3,8,22,...1, 3, 8, 22, .... Not our sequence.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 squares (color A) and 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes (color B), such that no three consecutive 1imes11 imes 1 squares occur. The recurrence is an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. Let's try to match initial conditions (1,1,1)(1,1,1). a0=1a_0 = 1 (empty tiling) a1=1a_1 = 1 (tile A) a2=1a_2 = 1 (tile B or AA? No, AA is allowed, A is 1x1, B is 1x2. So for n=2, we have AA or B. This gives 2 ways. So initial conditions (1,1,1)(1,1,1) are not directly generated by this simple tiling.

Let's consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of strings of length nn using alphabet {1, 2, 3} such that no adjacent characters are the same. an=3imes2n−1a_n = 3 imes 2^{n-1}.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 squares (color A) and 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes (color B), such that no three consecutive 1imes11 imes 1 squares appear. The recurrence is an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. Initial conditions: a0=1,a1=1,a2=1a_0=1, a_1=1, a_2=1. Let's try to define the objects for these initial conditions. n=0n=0: empty tiling - 1 way. n=1n=1: Tile A - 1 way. n=2n=2: Tile B - 1 way. (We cannot use AA because that would imply a2=a1+a0+a−1a_2 = a_1 + a_0 + a_{-1}, which is not how it works. The states need to be defined by the last tile(s)). Let ana_n be the number of tilings of length nn with 1imes11 imes 1 squares (color A) and 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes (color B) without three consecutive A's. Let an(0)a_n^{(0)} be the number of such tilings ending with B. Let an(1)a_n^{(1)} be the number of such tilings ending with A. Let an(2)a_n^{(2)} be the number of such tilings ending with AA. an=an(0)+an(1)+an(2)a_n = a_n^{(0)} + a_n^{(1)} + a_n^{(2)}. an(0)=an−1(0)+an−1(1)+an−1(2)=an−1a_n^{(0)} = a_{n-1}^{(0)} + a_{n-1}^{(1)} + a_{n-1}^{(2)} = a_{n-1}. (Append B to any valid tiling of length n−1n-1). an(1)=an−1(0)a_n^{(1)} = a_{n-1}^{(0)}. (Append A to a tiling ending in B). an(2)=an−1(1)a_n^{(2)} = a_{n-1}^{(1)}. (Append A to a tiling ending in A). So an=an−1+an−1(0)+an−1(1)=an−1+an−2+an−2(0)=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-1}^{(0)} + a_{n-1}^{(1)} = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-2}^{(0)} = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. Now, let's check initial conditions for (1,1,1)(1,1,1). n=0n=0: 1 (empty) n=1n=1: A - a1(1)=1a_1^{(1)}=1. a1=1a_1=1. Correct. n=2n=2: AA, B. a2(0)a_2^{(0)} (ends in B): a1=1a_1=1. a2(1)a_2^{(1)} (ends in A): a1(0)=0a_1^{(0)}=0. a2(2)a_2^{(2)} (ends in AA): a1(1)=1a_1^{(1)}=1. So a2=a2(0)+a2(1)+a2(2)=1+0+1=2a_2 = a_2^{(0)} + a_2^{(1)} + a_2^{(2)} = 1 + 0 + 1 = 2. This does not match a2=1a_2=1.

Let's consider strings of length nn using alphabet {1, 2, 3}. Let ana_n be the number of strings where no three consecutive digits are the same. Sequence: 1,3,8,22,...1, 3, 8, 22, ....

Let's consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣An∣=2n−1|A_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set BnB_n of size ana_n and an injection f:BnoAnf: B_n o A_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n board with 1imes11 imes 1 squares (color A) and 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes (color B), such that no three consecutive A's occur. The recurrence is an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. Let's try to force the (1,1,1)(1,1,1) initial conditions. a0=1,a1=1,a2=1a_0=1, a_1=1, a_2=1. a3=a2+a1+a0=1+1+1=3a_3 = a_2+a_1+a_0 = 1+1+1 = 3. Sequence: 1,1,1,3,5,9,17,31,...1, 1, 1, 3, 5, 9, 17, 31, ...

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 squares (color A) and 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes (color B), such that no three consecutive A's appear. We need to find a combinatorial interpretation that yields the sequence 1,1,1,3,5,9,...1, 1, 1, 3, 5, 9, ....

Consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣An∣=2n−1|A_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set BnB_n of size ana_n and an injection f:BnoAnf: B_n o A_n.

Let ana_n be the number of strings of length nn using alphabet {1, 2, 3} such that no three consecutive digits are the same. This yields 1,3,8,22,...1, 3, 8, 22, ....

Let's consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Consider the set AnA_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣An∣=2n−1|A_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set BnB_n of size ana_n and an injection f:BnoAnf: B_n o A_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n board using 1imes11 imes 1 squares (color A) and 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes (color B), such that no three consecutive A's appear. To match the sequence 1,1,1,3,5,9,...1, 1, 1, 3, 5, 9, ..., we need a specific way to define the states.

Let's consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 squares (color A) and 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes (color B), such that no three consecutive A's appear. The recurrence is an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}. Let's try to define the combinatorial objects for a0=1,a1=1,a2=1a_0=1, a_1=1, a_2=1. n=0n=0: empty tiling - 1. n=1n=1: tiling with one A. - 1. n=2n=2: tiling with two B's? No, 1imes21 imes 2 domino. Tiling with one B. - 1. n=3n=3: Using an=an−1+an−2+an−3a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} + a_{n-3}: a3=1+1+1=3a_3 = 1+1+1 = 3. Possible tilings: AAB, BA, C (if C is 1imes31 imes 3). Let's stick to 1imes11 imes 1 (A) and 1imes21 imes 2 (B). For n=3n=3: ABA, B A, BB. This gives 3. Seems to work.

So, ana_n is the number of tilings of a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 tiles (color A) and 1imes21 imes 2 tiles (color B) such that no three consecutive A's appear. We need to show ane2n−1a_n e 2^{n-1} for ne1n e 1.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n| = 2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of such tilings. For each tiling, we can generate a binary string of length n−1n-1. If the tiling ends with B, we write 0. The remaining n−1n-1 cells must form a valid tiling. This is an−1a_{n-1} ways. So we map to strings of length n−1n-1 starting with 0. If the tiling ends with A, we look at the previous cell. If it's B, we write 10. The remaining n−2n-2 cells must form a valid tiling. This is an−2a_{n-2} ways. So we map to strings of length n−1n-1 starting with 10. If the tiling ends with AA, we look at the cell before that. If it's B, we write 110. The remaining n−3n-3 cells must form a valid tiling. This is an−3a_{n-3} ways. So we map to strings of length n−1n-1 starting with 110.

This doesn't directly create the injection. Let's rethink the mapping.

Consider a tiling counted by ana_n. We want to associate it with a binary string of length n−1n-1. Let's consider the positions of the 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes. Each domino covers two cells. A 1imes11 imes 1 tile covers one cell.

Consider the set SnS_n of binary strings of length n−1n-1. ∣Sn∣=2n−1|S_n|=2^{n-1}. We need to find a set TnT_n of size ana_n and an injection f:TnoSnf: T_n o S_n.

Let ana_n be the number of ways to tile a 1imesn1 imes n strip using 1imes11 imes 1 squares (color A) and 1imes21 imes 2 dominoes (color B), such that no three consecutive A's appear.

Consider a tiling TT of length nn. We want to map it to a binary string of length n−1n-1.

Let TT be a tiling of length nn. If TT ends with a B tile, we map it to the string 0s′0s', where s′s' is the mapping of the tiling of length n−1n-1. There are an−1a_{n-1} such tilings. This corresponds to strings starting with 0. If TT ends with an A tile, we map it to 1s′′1s'', where s′′s'' is the mapping of the tiling of length n−1n-1. We need to be careful about the